canadian health care

The following bind written by Dr. Alan Bernstein. President of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) ran in the May 23. 2007 edition of the Globe and Mail. It is an abbreviated version of an address Dr. Bernstein gave to the Canadian unify of Toronto on March 26. 2007The rise of India and China as economic powerhouses the development of new global communication technologies global warming the emergence of new infectious pathogens like SARS powerful new insights into the workings of the human be are all creating tremendous challenges and opportunities for countries like Canada. In a flat world no country is immune from these global tectonic shifts. We are in a race without a end lineThe 20th century has been characterized by remarkable improvements in human health virtually everywhere object sub-Saharan Africa. Longevity in the West has increased by almost two years per decade for the past sixteen decades. New drugs and diagnostic technologies fuelled by profound advances in the biological sciences are increasingly based on a detailed molecular understanding of human biology and disease. We are reaching the stage where we can prevent or slow down the onset of some diseases before clinical symptoms are even apparent. Information and communication technologies (ICTs) will also play a key role. As our population ages and as we act increasingly from the acute diseases to the chronic conditions of aging (dementias diabetes arthritis frailty). ICTs will link together our homes our bodies our clinics and our hospitals. Regenerative care for including nanotechnology bioengineering and perhaps originate in cells will transform how we ameliorate or regenerate defective or worn out be parts. But most profoundly it ordain be the synergy that will come from combining this new science and new technology and a heightened sensitivity of our personal responsibility for our own bodies that ordain transform human health and our health system. This profound transformation of health care into a knowledge-based activity has huge economic implications. In our country health care is a $140 billion industry. In the U. S. that number is $2 trillion. China currently spends $60 per person per year on health care. For Canada that be is $4,600. So as China's spending on health care goes from $60 to $600 million over the next decade the health care industry in China ordain become a $800 billion industry. Despite all our concerns about our own health system. Canada has arguably one of the best and well run health systems in the world. That know-how that knowledge is as exportable and profitable as lumber or oil. Health care is Canada's largest knowledge industry an industry that will undergo phenomenal growth and merchandise opportunities over the next twenty-five years. It is an example of the importance of knowledge and knowledge industries to Canada's future. And it is a model for how we should structure our thinking about Science and Technology (S&T). To go away we be to rethink our view of productivity and competitiveness. Productivity today is not about lowering the unit costs of manufacturing picture-tube TVs. Productivity today is about inventing flat screen technologies. Productivity today is not about lowering the unit production costs of bovine insulin. Productivity today is about invention of recombinant DNA technology to create human insulin in bacteria. Productivity today is not about improving the efficiency of our health system through training fewer doctors and nurses. Productivity today is about the invention and system-wide application of new ideas and new technologies that will go up and improve health delivery. The process of discovery is itself transforming the nature of competition. In a resource-based economy scarcity drives up price. But in a knowledge economy it is just the opposite. Software's value goes up the more it is shared. The first fax machine or phone was useless. And there seems to be no end to new knowledge. Knowledge is not like oil or a piece of capital equipment. Knowledge is not used up worn out or consumed. Quite the opposite - knowledge and new ideas are different: the more you use them the more valuable they become. The centrality of S&T to Canada's future raises other issues such as the need for partnerships and collaborations. In a knowledge economy knowledge is the most precious commodity. Often the ideas or intellectual property generated in one affiliate or one university acquires determine only when combined with the ideas from another company or university. Companies universities and countries must therefore strike strategic and dynamic collaborations in an act to act the synergies and complementarities that can only go by merging ideas creating partnerships and building relationships. Canada is come up positioned to act leadership in this area. Science diplomacy particularly health science diplomacy will be a powerful way for Canada to reach out to the world. We place importance on good health and a public health system. I believe that those values coupled with Canada's exceptionally strong health investigate enterprise and the universal nature of science that transcends language and culture ordain make health science diplomacy as important a diplomatic tool in this century as Pearsonian diplomacy was for Canada in the last century. For our cities to become a knowledge-based hub proximity to market is no longer the issue. But proximity to the world's best universities and to the best investigate talent is. We are witnessing the 'death of hold'The measure point is obvious. A successful knowledge economy is built on a highly educated workforce and a society that understands what research is all about and engaged in the issues raised by science. Science is quite simply the best way humanity has come up with to solve important problems. Indeed some of the greatest opportunities for economic progress will go from helping the world solve its biggest problems - in human health in energy the environment in building sustainable cites. This is how. I accept we ordain generate the new jobs wealth for our country and well-being for our citizens. This is what science and innovation is all about - discovering and applying new scientific ideas new knowledge to change the world. Real cutting-edge research is tough to doBut transforming science into new products and new policies is even tougher - it is a complex process that involves iterative interactions between the producers and users of new knowledge. Canada is in a race without a end line. It's a go to build a nation that provides rewarding careers for our children that has a sustainable health system a strong education system and that is a paradigm for the planet. We're in a race to create new ideas and to transform those ideas into economic advantage. I believe Canada can win that race. But how on earth do you win a go without a finish line? First you undergo to enter the race. And second you have to enter it to win.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://longwoodsblog.blogspot.com/2007/10/canada-in-flat-world-health-science.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

The following article written by Dr. Alan Bernstein. President of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) ran in the May 23. 2007 edition of the Globe and Mail. It is an abbreviated version of an address Dr. Bernstein gave to the Canadian Club of Toronto on March 26. 2007The rise of India and China as economic powerhouses the development of new global communication technologies global warming the emergence of new infectious pathogens like SARS powerful new insights into the workings of the human body are all creating tremendous challenges and opportunities for countries like Canada. In a flat world no country is immune from these global tectonic shifts. We are in a race without a finish lineThe 20th century has been characterized by remarkable improvements in human health virtually everywhere except sub-Saharan Africa. Longevity in the West has increased by almost two years per decade for the past sixteen decades. New drugs and diagnostic technologies fuelled by profound advances in the biological sciences are increasingly based on a detailed molecular understanding of human biology and disease. We are reaching the stage where we can prevent or slow down the onset of some diseases before clinical symptoms are even apparent. Information and communication technologies (ICTs) ordain also compete a key role. As our population ages and as we move increasingly from the acute diseases to the chronic conditions of aging (dementias diabetes arthritis frailty). ICTs will link together our homes our bodies our clinics and our hospitals. Regenerative medicine including nanotechnology bioengineering and perhaps originate in cells will transform how we repair or replace defective or worn out be parts. But most profoundly it will be the synergy that will come from combining this new science and new technology and a heightened sensitivity of our personal responsibility for our own bodies that ordain transform human health and our health system. This profound transformation of health care into a knowledge-based activity has huge economic implications. In our country health care is a $140 billion industry. In the U. S. that be is $2 trillion. China currently spends $60 per person per year on health care. For Canada that number is $4,600. So as China's spending on health care goes from $60 to $600 million over the next decade the health care industry in China will become a $800 billion industry. Despite all our concerns about our own health system. Canada has arguably one of the best and well run health systems in the world. That know-how that knowledge is as exportable and profitable as lumber or oil. Health care is Canada's largest knowledge industry an industry that ordain experience phenomenal growth and export opportunities over the next twenty-five years. It is an example of the importance of knowledge and knowledge industries to Canada's future. And it is a model for how we should coordinate our thinking about Science and Technology (S&T). To start we need to rethink our believe of productivity and competitiveness. Productivity today is not about lowering the unit costs of manufacturing picture-tube TVs. Productivity today is about inventing flat screen technologies. Productivity today is not about lowering the unit production costs of bovine insulin. Productivity today is about invention of recombinant DNA technology to create human insulin in bacteria. Productivity today is not about improving the efficiency of our health system through training fewer doctors and nurses. Productivity today is about the invention and system-wide application of new ideas and new technologies that will go up and alter health delivery. The affect of discovery is itself transforming the nature of competition. In a resource-based economy scarcity drives up price. But in a knowledge economy it is just the opposite. Software's value goes up the more it is shared. The first fax machine or phone was useless. And there seems to be no end to new knowledge. Knowledge is not like oil or a piece of capital equipment. Knowledge is not used up worn out or consumed. Quite the opposite - knowledge and new ideas are different: the more you use them the more valuable they change state. The centrality of S&T to Canada's future raises other issues such as the need for partnerships and collaborations. In a knowledge economy knowledge is the most precious commodity. Often the ideas or intellectual property generated in one company or one university acquires value only when combined with the ideas from another affiliate or university. Companies universities and countries must therefore strike strategic and dynamic collaborations in an act to create the synergies and complementarities that can only come by merging ideas creating partnerships and building relationships. Canada is well positioned to take leadership in this area. Science diplomacy particularly health science diplomacy ordain be a powerful way for Canada to arrive out to the world. We place importance on good health and a public health system. I believe that those values coupled with Canada's exceptionally strong health research enterprise and the universal nature of science that transcends language and grow will make health science diplomacy as important a diplomatic drive in this century as Pearsonian diplomacy was for Canada in the last century. For our cities to become a knowledge-based hub proximity to market is no longer the issue. But proximity to the world's best universities and to the best research talent is. We are witnessing the 'death of distance'The measure point is obvious. A successful knowledge economy is built on a highly educated workforce and a society that understands what research is all about and engaged in the issues raised by science. Science is quite simply the best way humanity has go up with to understand important problems. Indeed some of the greatest opportunities for economic progress ordain come from helping the world solve its biggest problems - in human health in energy the environment in building sustainable cites. This is how. I believe we ordain generate the new jobs wealth for our country and well-being for our citizens. This is what science and innovation is all about - discovering and applying new scientific ideas new knowledge to change the world. Real cutting-edge investigate is tough to doBut transforming science into new products and new policies is even tougher - it is a complex affect that involves iterative interactions between the producers and users of new knowledge. Canada is in a go without a finish lie. It's a race to build a nation that provides rewarding careers for our children that has a sustainable health system a strong education system and that is a paradigm for the planet. We're in a race to create new ideas and to transform those ideas into economic favor. I accept Canada can win that race. But how on earth do you win a go without a finish lie? First you have to enter the race. And second you undergo to enter it to win.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://longwoodsblog.blogspot.com/2007/10/canada-in-flat-world-health-science.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

The following article written by Dr. Alan Bernstein. President of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) ran in the May 23. 2007 edition of the Globe and Mail. It is an abbreviated version of an address Dr. Bernstein gave to the Canadian Club of Toronto on March 26. 2007The go of India and China as economic powerhouses the development of new global communication technologies global warming the emergence of new infectious pathogens like SARS powerful new insights into the workings of the human body are all creating tremendous challenges and opportunities for countries desire Canada. In a flat world no country is immune from these global tectonic shifts. We are in a go without a finish lineThe 20th century has been characterized by remarkable improvements in human health virtually everywhere except sub-Saharan Africa. Longevity in the West has increased by almost two years per decade for the past sixteen decades. New drugs and diagnostic technologies fuelled by profound advances in the biological sciences are increasingly based on a detailed molecular understanding of human biology and disease. We are reaching the stage where we can prevent or decrease down the onset of some diseases before clinical symptoms are even apparent. Information and communication technologies (ICTs) ordain also compete a key role. As our population ages and as we move increasingly from the acute diseases to the chronic conditions of aging (dementias diabetes arthritis frailty). ICTs ordain link together our homes our bodies our clinics and our hospitals. Regenerative medicine including nanotechnology bioengineering and perhaps stem cells will alter how we repair or replace defective or worn out be parts. But most profoundly it will be the synergy that ordain come from combining this new science and new technology and a heightened sensitivity of our personal responsibility for our own bodies that will alter human health and our health system. This profound transformation of health care into a knowledge-based activity has huge economic implications. In our country health care is a $140 billion industry. In the U. S. that number is $2 trillion. China currently spends $60 per person per year on health care. For Canada that number is $4,600. So as China's spending on health care goes from $60 to $600 million over the next decade the health care industry in China will become a $800 billion industry. Despite all our concerns about our own health system. Canada has arguably one of the best and well run health systems in the world. That know-how that knowledge is as exportable and profitable as walk or oil. Health care is Canada's largest knowledge industry an industry that will experience phenomenal growth and merchandise opportunities over the next twenty-five years. It is an example of the importance of knowledge and knowledge industries to Canada's future. And it is a copy for how we should structure our thinking about Science and Technology (S&T). To start we need to rethink our view of productivity and competitiveness. Productivity today is not about lowering the unit costs of manufacturing picture-tube TVs. Productivity today is about inventing flat screen technologies. Productivity today is not about lowering the unit production costs of bovine insulin. Productivity today is about invention of recombinant DNA technology to produce human insulin in bacteria. Productivity today is not about improving the efficiency of our health system through training fewer doctors and nurses. Productivity today is about the invention and system-wide application of new ideas and new technologies that will speed up and improve health delivery. The process of discovery is itself transforming the nature of competition. In a resource-based economy scarcity drives up determine. But in a knowledge economy it is just the opposite. Software's value goes up the more it is shared. The first fax machine or phone was useless. And there seems to be no end to new knowledge. Knowledge is not like oil or a piece of capital equipment. Knowledge is not used up worn out or consumed. Quite the opposite - knowledge and new ideas are different: the more you use them the more valuable they become. The centrality of S&T to Canada's future raises other issues such as the need for partnerships and collaborations. In a knowledge economy knowledge is the most precious commodity. Often the ideas or intellectual property generated in one company or one university acquires value only when combined with the ideas from another affiliate or university. Companies universities and countries must therefore strike strategic and dynamic collaborations in an attempt to create the synergies and complementarities that can only go by merging ideas creating partnerships and building relationships. Canada is well positioned to act leadership in this area. Science diplomacy particularly health science diplomacy will be a powerful way for Canada to reach out to the world. We place importance on good health and a public health system. I believe that those values coupled with Canada's exceptionally strong health research enterprise and the universal nature of science that transcends language and culture will make health science diplomacy as important a diplomatic tool in this century as Pearsonian diplomacy was for Canada in the measure century. For our cities to become a knowledge-based hub proximity to market is no longer the issue. But proximity to the world's best universities and to the best investigate talent is. We are witnessing the 'death of distance'The last point is obvious. A successful knowledge economy is built on a highly educated workforce and a society that understands what investigate is all about and engaged in the issues raised by science. Science is quite simply the best way humanity has go up with to solve important problems. Indeed some of the greatest opportunities for economic develop ordain go from helping the world understand its biggest problems - in human health in energy the environment in building sustainable cites. This is how. I believe we will generate the new jobs wealth for our country and well-being for our citizens. This is what science and innovation is all about - discovering and applying new scientific ideas new knowledge to change the world. Real cutting-edge research is tough to doBut transforming science into new products and new policies is even tougher - it is a complex process that involves iterative interactions between the producers and users of new knowledge. Canada is in a race without a finish line. It's a race to build a nation that provides rewarding careers for our children that has a sustainable health system a strong education system and that is a paradigm for the planet. We're in a race to generate new ideas and to transform those ideas into economic advantage. I believe Canada can win that go. But how on earth do you win a race without a finish line? First you have to enter the race. And second you have to enter it to win.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://longwoodsblog.blogspot.com/2007/10/canada-in-flat-world-health-science.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Get a real-time look beneath the surface in the with our tools and. Also see our original real-time tracking system. Check out where you can Digg and watch the activity of your favorite Presidential candidates. © Digg Inc. 2008 —Content posted byDigg usersis. DIGG. DIGG IT. DUGG. DIGG THIS. Digg graphics logos designs summon headers button icons scripts and other function names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://digg.com/health/A_Canadian_offers_his_diagnosis_on_health_care

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

This paper reexamines differences found between income gradients in American and English children's health in results originally published by Case. Lubotsky and Paxson (2002) for the US and by Currie. Shields and Wheatley Price (2007) for England. We sight that when the English sample is expanded by adding three years of data and is compared to American data from the same time period the income gradient in children's health increases with age by the same amount in the two countries. In addition we find that Currie. Shields and Wheatley Price's measures of chronic conditions from the Health analyse of England were incorrectly coded. Using correctly coded data we find that the effects of chronic conditions on health status are larger in the English consume than in the American sample and that income plays a larger role in buffering children's health from the effects of chronic conditions in England. We find no bear witness that the British National Health Service with its focus on free services and compete access prevents the association between health and income from becoming more pronounced as children grow older. Does Canada's publicly funded single payer health care system mouth better health outcomes and give health resources more equitably than the multi-payer heavily private U. S system? We show that the efficacy of health care systems cannot be usefully evaluated by comparisons of infant mortality and life expectancy. We analyze several alternative measures of health status using JCUSH (The Joint Canada/U. S. Survey of Health) and other surveys. We sight a somewhat higher incidence of chronic health conditions in the U. S than in Canada but somewhat greater U. S access to treatment for these conditions. Moreover a significantly higher percentage of U. S women and men are screened for major forms of cancer. Although health status measured in various ways is similar in both countries mortality/incidence ratios for various cancers tend to be higher in Canada. The need to ration resources in Canada where care is delivered "free" ultimately leads to long waits. In the U. S. costs are more often a source of unmet needs. We also find that Canada has no more abolished the tendency for health status to alter with income than have other countries. Indeed the health-income gradient is slightly steeper in Canada than it is in the U. S. Got that? Poor people fare slightly exceed in the U. S health system than they do in the Canadian system. On a scale of 0 to.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://socglory.blogspot.com/2007/10/so-health-care-for-poor-is-better-in.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

This pass. Sen. Hillary Clinton talked tough on health care. "It is measure to undergo quality and affordable health care for all Americans," she said in East Las Vegas. Hillary brought forth two women including a converge cancer survivor as proof the American system needs HillaryCare. I thought of that converge cancer survivor in particular as I read an important new National Bureau of Economic Research paper by June O'Neill and Dave O'Neill two respected Baruch College economists. "Health Status. Health Care and Inequality: Canada vs the U. S." Canada has universal single-payer national health insurance. In theory. Canadians who get free health care as a government "alter" should be much healthier than Americans who face more barriers of be to accessing health care right? And by some widely touted measures. Canadians are healthier -- both life expectancy and infant mortality are better in Canada. But as these two scholars point out life expectancy and infant mortality "are poor measures of the efficacy of a health care system" because they are "influenced by many factors that are unrelated to the quality and accessibility of medical care." If more populate drink too much control too abstain and don't wear seat belts life expectancy ordain be lower for reasons having nothing to do with the health care system. Similarly if you drop your youth eating too much sleeping too little exercising only occasionally and are genetically predisposed to diabetes (like say me) you are more likely to get egest in lay age than populate who adopt healthier lifestyles. Doctors can only do so much. For judging whether nationalized health care beats the U. S health care system the question populate really want to experience is: Under what system are you more likely to get the health care needed to prevent and treat chronic or life-threatening illnesses? Recent data from the Joint Canada-United States analyse of Health (jointly designed and conducted by Statistics Canada and the National Center for Health Statistics) remove new lighten on this urgent challenge. Here's the surprising bottom line: It's somewhat better to be sick in the United States than in Canada. Americans are -- and this astonishingly countercultural truth bears repeating -- more likely to get preventive health care treatment for serious or chronic health conditions than Canadians who have a government-guaranteed right to health care. In particular. Americans are more likely to get screened for common cancers including breast cancer cervical cancer prostate cancer and colon cancer. Canadians also have far less find to sophisticated medical screening technologies such as MRIs and CT scanners (the authors call the gap "very large"). Plus. "waiting times are significantly longer in Canada than in the U. S." Thirty-three percent of Canadians who say they have an unmet medical need reported being in pain that limits their daily activities compared to 22 percent of Americans who inform an unmet need. Moreover. U. S residents "give significantly higher ratings to the quality of care received and were more satisfied with health care services received than were Canadians," say the scholars. But perhaps less-affluent people do exceed in Canada? Not really. Among working-age adults (18-64) the health gap based on income is actually greater in Canada than in the United States according to this new more accurate income data. Americans who have cancer may come up face harrowing problems that be addressing by presidential candidates. But we are also significantly more likely to defeat and be able to make it onstage with Hillary to complain about the U. S health care system. I don't know why Canadians allow a system where sick people are routinely denied quick access to care that they need. But the logic of "remove government health care" is this: "When no one is faced with any charge for services demand is unrestrained and costs surge," June O'Neill and Dave O'Neill inform. "It is not surprising that shortages developed and explicit rationing became widespread in Canada." This is clearly ideologically biased research that attempts to use fuzzy statistics to make its ridiculous point that Americans should not pursue affordable healthcare. Firstly the authors affirm that longevity and infant mortality are poor predictors of the suitability and effectiveness of a nation’s healthcare system. However it is precisely the poorest nations in the world who do not have organized healthcare that undergo the greatest aim of infant mortality and shortest lifespans of anyone. While other factors tangentially affect longevity and infant mortality the wealth of a nation and the availability of healthcare for its members are the BEST POSSIBLE PREDICTORS. Additionally the authors lead the reader to inproper conclusions twisting the stats when they say that 33 percent of Canadians with “Unmet Needs” complain of chronic pain compared to 22percent of Americans. However it leaves to challenge the harmonise of the actual population that complains of unmet needs. It is possible that 33percent of 1% of the Canadian population complains of unmet needs while 22percent of 35% of Americans with unmet needs complain of chronic pain. Shortsighted propaganda research that fains science! Alarmed by his wife's slide in the polls and disarray within her backbiting campaign a beside-himself Bill Clinton has leaped atop the barricades and is furiously plotting a cure - or coup.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.hillaryproject.com/index.php?/en/story-details/the_cost_of_hillarycare/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

accept! This is the blog of a former TV news anchor who is now far removed from that business but still loves to keep track of what's important in the world. This communicate is designed to add up posts that I feel are important and/or interesting. I'm not going to bury you in lengthy diatribes; I simply want to give you a spot you can bookmark and return to for a daily be at information to get you talking. Just in inspect somebody happens to forward a viral telecommunicate making the rounds here's some detailed debunking that'll give you solid ground from which to lay out.   The telecommunicate purports to be from a Canadian who pretty well trashes the Health Care system up there. Seems our Canadian friend is really - And he has a false story to express.  Actually. SEVERAL false stories.  We had a terrific go doing this blog as part of a daily TV program. The program went away and now. I've moved on to something completely different. I'm no longer associated with the Media but the communicate ordain continue. With your help (in the comments) we'll keep it moving send as the 2008 campaign kicks into high gear. So come down in. Get to reading. And alter sure you get a comment every once in a while. Or you can telecommunicate me at doug krile@gmail com

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://krilefiles.blogspot.com/2007/10/canadian-health-care.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

I haven't bothered to respond to any of the Fraser Institutes PR efforts on behalf of the Insurance and Pharmaceutical industries of late because there seems little inform. Few aside from an ideological hard core even seem to pay attention to them any more and most of their wacky pronouncements on Canadian health care for example seem intended mostly to give fodder for American right wingers fighting the increasingly desperate and hopeless battle against an increasingly inevitable universal system there. Canadians. The National affix's dwindling subscriber base aside simply aren't buying. But the spat who's in charge of the Fraser initiate's health care distortions and calls for comment if only because I really don't believe a Conservative Minister to defend public care and because the National Pest appears to have made only Esmail's side of the fight available. The right has jumped on wait times as their new health care bugaboo in their desire war against the public system. Of course many of the act time problems facing Canada originate in from policy decisions by alter wing politicians in the first place. Seems like a lifetime ago but we're comfort paying for these kind of panicky reactionary steps. But trusting alter go numbers on wait times requires a certain amount of breathless naiveté. Esmail angrily defends the paltry 26% of ideologically self selecting responses from doctors to the Fraser Institutes's wait times study as. It is of course virtually the platonic ideal of a small and unreliable sample. Denying that fact in a loud clear voice doesn't change it. He also decries 'rhetoric and misleading information'. I know hard to accept the ballsiness; rhetoric and misleading information are the Fraser Institutes bread and butter. Hence the call of this post as the alter tries to create them were largely the result of alter wing funding decisions to mouth with and have been dropping over the last few years. And it's that are making them drop with the added 'benefit' of double the cost per capita for their health care non-system that leaves millions with no coverage at all. W so moving towards American style private care would make matters worse. Once the wait times bugaboo loses it's power wait for the free merchandise ideologues at the Fraser Institute to find some other avenue to battle public health care. Just don't alter the mistake of thinking they actually care.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://rustyidols.blogspot.com/2007/10/irony-isnt-dead.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

This post makes no act to be my usual reserved and thoughtful self. This affix ordain be nothing but act at our broken socialized socialist medicare in which a five-year old child was denied his universal alter to access. My child. I got off bring home the bacon early today and was domiciliate by 3pm. My wife wanted to take my son to a walk-in clinic in Brampton because he had had a high fever for four days and it showed no write of letting up. His family adulterate is in Toronto so we decided to brave the wait and headed for the one closest to our house. When we arrived. I sat drink with my son in the waiting dwell while my wife registered him. After a great broach of measure. I noticed my wife was getting increasingly agitated. She finally posed an ultimatum to the belligerent cater: "Are you saying you are denying medical care to my five year-old son?""Yes."The issue was that something was do by with my son's OHIP separate and the clinic had said we had to pay a $60 visitation fee to "ensure" the clinic got paid in inspect it could not be resolved. How could it not be resolved? My son was born in Toronto. I was born in Toronto. My create was born in Toronto. My grandfather was born in Huron county. And so was his father and his create and his create. Just how many hundreds of years does a family have to be in Canada before they get access to medical care without question? Apparently not long. The multitude of immigrants ahead of us speaking a variety of languages were all presumably approved. We left on principle perhaps a identify in remember. I pay an obscene amount of taxes and I anticipate a great broach of it goes to health care. On top of this I haven't visited a doctor in 18 years. So I don't even believe myself a user of the system although I appreciate the fact it services my wife and son. When it works that is. After a few more walk-in clinics denying us our universal alter to medical care we went to the only displace available to us. Peel Memorial Hospital. Let me tell you something. The main topic of the candidates debate in Brampton West was about health care and now I understand fully why. Health care here is absolutely and completely broken. The purgatory of waiting rooms we stayed in for four hours to undergo someone analyse our son [who had by now had difficulty breathing] could only be described as a kind of hell invented by a third world communist oligarchy. After waiting while the emergency called roughly one person per hour into the next waiting dwell we were finally called and my son was given Tylenol which actually perked him up. Then we were dispatched back to the waiting room. Then we were summoned again and sent to a new waiting dwell. An hour later a nurse came by and checked our papers and said we had been waiting in the do by dwell and took us to a third and new waiting dwell stuffed with adults. I couldn't accept it. It was desire "K" trying to enter the castle with each new door bringing a new and more fearsome gatekeeper. This was Kafkaesque in the most unpleasant manner imaginable. And the fact I realized I am in Canada made it all the worse. We finally left without treatment. Here's to hoping my son doesn't deteriorate any further. My seven-months pregnant wife had to leave to eat and I hadn't had anything myself since noon. Then there's always my son who throughout the ordeal had been coughing up a lung who also needed to be fed. I had no idea our health care system considered five-year old children so expendable. But I also entangle sorry for those who waited behind in a kind of never-ending limbo the hordes of elderly populate relegated to the passages and corridors and waiting rooms. This is dignity in it's most abused express. This is the kind of treatment I would expect at a prison dwell or a vernichtungslager. To think I pay taxes for this kind of treatment it makes me query whether we're all just a bunch of fools to pay the government for services we can't change surface acquire. I'll tell you what government allow me to act my entire pay draw for once and I will gladly pay your medical daub money out of my own take like the extortionist profit-for-health care parasites you are. The is no remove meal. A one tiered system controlled by the government has only one way to control costs and that is by reducing access. 95% of the measure the system gets away with it. 5% we comprehend horror stories desire yours. As a physician. I understand your arouse. I can tell you that change surface for me the thought of having to believe upon our health care setup is daunting and I dread the times when I ordain be it for myself my parents and my children. But what do you expect? At the end of the day turning the health care system into a government corporation where money policy and future planning are controlled by bureaucrats behind closed doors will prove in the same outcome as with any other government operation. The crime is that it is against the law to buy yourself better healthcare if you decide to do so. We can buy a better accommodate if we have the means. We can buy better food or exceed schools for our kids if we have the means. But we cannot buy exceed healthcare short of crosssing the border. Where does it say that health care is a more basic element of life than food and shelter?? Speaking as a dumbass liberal. I would undergo paid the 60 bucks and gotten my kid taken care of before raising a stink.... Allright. I've already admitted to that. But the point is that I'm already stripped of half my income and then the rest goes towards home survival and of course gasoline for the car. When I evaluate about how hard I work for my money and the fact I don't even use the system and then my child is denied find. Well that's not why my grandfather fought for socialized medicine. And I'll tell you something else. He didn't fight for socialized care for so the Brampton waiting rooms could be crammed with refugees and landed immigrants. And again. I'd gladly pay for health care on my own. But the government has to stop stealing my pay draw first. This Robin cover country has to change. But hey if your son had died while you held your breath and stamped your feet it would undergo made for one helluva affix on BT... That's a pretty classy statement. At least you followed it up with the cerebrate. Raphael:"my child is denied access"--Don't lie. Your child was never denied access. There was a problem with his OHIP card you had the option to pay 60 bucks but you threw a fit instead and put your child's life at assay in the process."He didn't contend for socialized medicine so the Brampton waiting rooms could be crammed with refugees and landed immigrants."--OK now we're getting to the truth aren't we? It's all about the dirty cook populate who don't deserve health care because they're not from here. Is that what pissed you off? That the dirty foreigners were somehow 'stealing' your health care? Would you have been as angry if it had been a waiting dwell beat of whiteys? Don't you find it even slightly embarrassing that the 'refugees and landed immigrants know how to get a proper health separate yet you and your 60 generations of 'real' Canadian stock can't get your documents in order? And by the way. I'm pretty sure your grandfather didn't 'contend' for socialized medicine. Or perhaps I missed the chapter on the Great OHIP War of 1892 when thousands of our boys gave their life for socialized health care. Incidentally you would do well to bequeath that the government is trying to crack down on OHIP fraud and re-create health cards. It's why your son's.

********************There seems little doubt these days that if a democrat becomes President of the US and the dems manage to maintain their hold back of the Congress there ordain be a create of socialized care for instituted in the United States. This holds especially true if that democrat is Mrs. Bill Clinton. We have already beaten back one act by Mrs. Clinton to undo heath care in the US… back when her husband. “The Boy President” was occupying the Oval Office. Nothing much has changed. Hillarycare 1.0 was defeated overwhelmingly on the first attempt. It was a ponderous mess. So. THIS measure they intend to make a different come… and it has already begun. Insuring the children is one of the incremental steps in saddling the Nation with a single-payer form of socialized healthcare. (It’s “for the children” don’t you know. The oldest brush aside of transfer cozen in the schedule STILL works on guilt ridden liberal Americans!) In any event we are informed that the next act will most likely be patterned after the Canadian nationalized healthcare system. Oh. GREAT! All indicators tell us these days that the Canadian system is about to come down of it’s own charge! That can’t be good! Ok so how does the Canadian healthcare system lade up against US healthcare these days anyway? Where exceed to get a comparison than from a declared liberal place. So we dropped by the place “Classically Liberal” at: “Considering that one of the alleged virtues of Canada’s health system is the “equality” factor it is interesting to see that more individuals in the US with specific conditions are receiving treatment than do their counterparts in Canada. The inform also open that the poor in the United States reported as much or more health care than those in Canada did. This report also noted that waiting time in Canada for care is significantly longer than in the United States. The absence of care they contend is more problematic than the ability to pay for the care. As they say “costs may be more easily overcome than the absence of services.” That is it is easier to sight a way to pay for care that is available than to alter the care available when it doesn’t exist. And when patients in both countries are asked to rate their satisfaction with the care they receive the typical American in spite of a reputation for complaining was happier than the typical Canadian.” “in light of the inability of the Canadian system to give the care it promised the nation’s Supreme act ruled that bans on private medical care were unconstitutional and inhumane.” What does this mean? It means that PRIVATE Health care is now LEGAL in Canada and Canadians are flocking to the private clinics… and the Government Healthcare system of Canada is change surface sending patients to the PRIVATE CLINICS for treatment they cannot give their patients! … And this is the system the dems want to attach the US with? WHY? Because it is another go in their intend to bring the welfare express to America and establish socialism as the “know” create of government in the US! There is NO SUCH THING AS FREE HEALTHCARE! SOMEBODY IS GOING TO PAY! Who pays? You and I will pay… in taxes. If you evaluate healthcare is expensive now… just wait ‘til it’s remove!

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://dixican.wordpress.com/2007/10/11/37/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

PACS:1 n. (acronym) conceive of Archiving and Communications System. A device or assort of devices and associated communicate components designed to hold on and retrieve medical images. 2 n. (acronym) hurt And Constant Suffering. Bandaged from continue to toe to show the importance of the new PACS technology at Seaforth Community Hospital. Don Morton of Seaforth adds to the be as donations came into the Seaforth Legion or were called in to CKNX radio during the annual Healthcare Heroes radiothon held on Saturday. Photo by Susan Hundertmark courtesy You won't hear about this in many places but PACS is a pretty expensive proposition. So what is a small hospital with limited funds going to do when it decides to take the plunge? If you bring home the bacon at the Seaforth Community Hospital in East Huron. Ontario you hold a Radiothon! The Seaforth Community Hospital foundation came very close to achieving its goal of $50,000 with $49,713 in donations during the annual CKNX Healthcare Heroes radiothon on Saturday.“It was a very successful day with just terrific community support,” said foundation chair Ron Lavoie on Monday. .(S)ome of the larger donations included $5,000 from the Seaforth TD-Canada Trust. $2,500 from the Seaforth CIBC and $1,000 from the Seaforth Lions Club. PACS technology allows diagnostic tests including nuclear care for. CT scans x-rays and ultrasounds to be produced with digital images which can then be transferred electronically. Adding in the amount raised at Saturday’s radiothon the foundation has raised $175,713 of its goal of $213,283 for the first arrange of the PACS fundraising. When the first phase is achieved. Lavoie said the next three years ordain be spent working towards the back up arrange - $350,000 towards a new x-ray forge for SCH. Dr. Heather Percival a physician on cater at Seaforth Community Hospital who apparently is not a radiologist noted: "This technology is absolutely essential. It’s important to keep us at the same level as the city hospitals. Without this technology we are approve in the so-called dark ages,” she said. Percival pointed out that small towns undergo to work hard to fundraise for up-to-date technology pointing out that some U. S cities have more MRIs than the entire province of Ontario. OK everyone act say. This is the end product of National Health compassionate. Radiothons to buy PACS systems. No doubt the Foundation ordain be holding a bake-sale to continue to fund their PACS. They will eventually undergo to pay for a viewing displace electricity. Cat 5 cables and so on. The US health-care consumer probably would never consider phoning in a donation to pay for his or her scanner. I really evaluate some out there are anticipating Hillary-care with glee thinking the government ordain give us the same level of service we get now but for remove. Sure. alter. Just ask the fine citizens of East Huron how much "free" care they're getting. You might want to ask them how much tax they pay in addition to radiothon donations. I query if said donations are tax-deductable in Canada? I am an add up Radiologist in an add up practice in an average town in the South. When it came time to replace an aging PACS system. I tried my beat to learn as much as I could about what's out there and it has change state an obsession ever since. I began posting frequently on on AuntMinnie com and populate actually seemed to be interested in what I had to say. So. I copied some of my more verbose posts and created a site of my own. DoctorDalai com! Obviously. I am posting my own personal opinions and observations here; act them for what they are worth. No divine knowledge or inspiration is implied. By the way the nickname is not intended to offend. I had to choose a discussion board title to throw off a vendor and I went for something that I thought no one would cerebrate with me! The vendor figured it out in five minutes but the name sticks to this day....

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://doctordalai.blogspot.com/2007/10/will-work-for-pacs-when-national.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

— The surgeon who operated on Dany Bureau tells his father that his appendix had burst and that he had developed peritonitis. As a result he is hospitalized for several days so his recovery can be monitored. ‘As many as 98,000 Americans still die each year because of medical errors despite an unprecedented focus on patient safety over the measure five years according to a chew over released today… The researchers blame the complexity of health care systems a lack of leadership the reluctance of doctors to admit errors and an insurance reimbursement system that rewards errors — hospitals can account for additional services needed when patients are injured by mistakes — but often ordain not pay for practices that decrease those errors.’ The affect of the affix is the shortage of physicians and medical facilities a problem that plagues all government-run health care systems (including that of Perfidious Albion). Your link is about medical errors and I don’t think even you will suggest that the Canadian system (or the NHS) has fewer medical errors that the U. S. Come on David - took me a few seconds to find one of many examples. ‘In December a 39-year-old Royal Palm Beach man who was vomiting daub could not be treated at Palms West because the hospital did not undergo a gastroenterologist. After a several hour decelerate he was transferred to a Fort Lauderdale hospital. The man had a heart attack upon arrival and died about two weeks later.’ after a delay of nearly 2 days. It meets neither requirement. Also you will undergo noticed that the paucity of specialists in your example is attributable to out-of-control malpractice lawsuits (which would be solved by Texas-style tort reform–a solution I disbelieve you would support). ‘Despite the lifesaving feats performed every day by emergency departments and ambulance services the nation’s emergency medical system as a whole is overburdened underfunded and highly fragmented says this series of three reports from the Institute of Medicine. As a result ambulances are turned away from emergency departments once every minute on average and patients in many areas may wait hours or even days for a hospital bed. Moreover the system is ill-prepared to handle surges from disasters such as hurricanes terrorist attacks or disease outbreaks.’ Why would you have to be transferred to another state for the situation to be analogous? The patient is from Aylmer. Quebec. The hospital was in Wakefield. Quebec. The surgery was done in Montreal. Quebec. All in Quebec. A horrifying story to be sure… but I’ve bring home the bacon in Ottawa and never heard of anything desire this happening before– a surgeon couldn’t be found? Bizarre. And certainly not an everyday occurrence. Mr. Bureau had to be driven a distance roughly equivalent to the trip from Baltimore. MD to Philadelphia. PA. Not a hugely important point. Just an act to highlight how Marc’s comparison doesn’t work. so you admit this kind of thing can come about in the U. S. but only because of EMTALA. What exactly is your inform again? The whole point of the original post was that this kind of thing doesn’t come about in the U. S. (of course i’m pretty sure it doesn’t happen that often in Canada either). Then when someone shows that it does in fact happen in the U. S. your response is to inform out a government regulation you don’t like that makes it so. None of the populate who be more government involvement desire EMTALA either. They’d much rather undergo a sensible system that covers everyone and doesn’t force hospitals to mouth billions in unpaid care each year at the point of EMTALA’s gun. You need to compare the way things are now. To say these things never happen in America is comprehensively rebutted in the inform I cited. Here’s an extract: ‘Hospital EDs have become frequently crowded environments with patients sometimes lining hallways and waiting hours and even days to be admitted to inpatient beds (Asplin et al.. 2003). Ambulance diversion once rare is now a common if not daily event in many major cities and can bring about to catastrophic consequences for patients (GAO. 2001; Schafermeyer and Asplin. 2003). Specialists needed to treat emergency and trauma patients are increasingly difficult to find; the result is longer waits and at times distant transport of critically ill or injured patients for specialty care. The emergency system itself appears to be crumbling in study cities. In Los Angeles for example. 8 hospital EDs undergo closed since 2003 bringing the be closed countywide to over 60 in the last decade (see Box 1-1) (Robes. 2005).’ happen in the U. S system. The point is that such things happen far more often in Canada. England and all of the other places you guys represent as paragons of medical care. And they usually come about because of central government meddling. EMTALA is relevant to this.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.healthcarebs.com/2007/10/20/canadian-health-care-another-horror-story/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Isilah form dibawah ini dan anda segera bisa memiliki communicate / Fill out this one-step create and you'll be blogging seconds later!Perhatian / Attention :Yang berhak jadi anggota blogwae com adalah orang Indonesia atau Melayu dengan penggunaan bahasa Indonesia/Melayu di blognya. Bagi yang ingin menggunakan bahasa asing diperbolehkan selama tetap menjadi orang Indonesia/Melayu. Pengecualian diberikan bila isinya berguna bagi pengguna dari Indonesia/Melayu. Blogwae com services just for Indonesia/Malay populate and not for other than that. We ordain not accept and deleted blog member that not owned by Indonesia/Malay people. Exception ordain be given if content of the blog useful for Indonesia/Malay people.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://losxpbar.blogwae.com/2007/09/17/measure-aimed-at-pressing-the-bush-autonation-usa-to-change-its-war-policy/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

hi currently applying for otr transport driving jobs in canada with companies involved in the pnp scheme as we understand it if the wife goes with me on the spouse despatch she ordain not be permitted an open work accept until with have been granted pnp which all the transport companies are saying takes six months to acheive is there anyway that she can work from day one? maybe a percific bring home the bacon accept attached to a canadian employer etcshe works in health care and has done for many years currently working for the nhs here on a drugs rehabiltation programe we've done plenty of research into the province we'd like to be in and there seems a lot of work available in her handle although her qualifications do not place her on the skilled workers enumerate as far as we can see? in the uk a way of getting a foot in the door for this line of bring home the bacon is to do voluntary and then take a post when it becomes available would this be a possible route around the work permit situation if all else fails?any advice would be much appreciated paul. hi currently applying for otr transport driving jobs in canada with companies involved in the pnp scheme as we understand it if the wife goes with me on the spouse despatch she will not be permitted an change state bring home the bacon accept until with have been granted pnp which all the transport companies are saying takes six months to acheive is there anyway that she can work from day one? maybe a percific bring home the bacon accept attached to a canadian employer etcshe works in health care and has done for many years currently working for the nhs here on a drugs rehabiltation programe we've done plenty of investigate into the province we'd like to be in and there seems a lot of bring home the bacon available in her field although her qualifications do not place her on the skilled workers enumerate as far as we can see? in the uk a way of getting a foot in the door for this line of bring home the bacon is to do voluntary and then take a post when it becomes available would this be a possible route around the work permit situation if all else fails?any advice would be much appreciated paul. 1. As Truck Drivers go into category C of the NOC as you experience your wife is not eligible for an OWP. So for her to bring home the bacon she is going to have to sight an employer that is willing to bear on for an LMO that there are no Canadian/PRs available for the job and they undergo advertised extensively. Anywhere from 8-16 weeks. If they receive the LMO for her then as the job appears to demand a medical (health Care) which ordain add another month then she would bear on to Vegreville for the bring home the bacon permit which are taking 75 days at show.2. By the time the affect is finished you should undergo your PNP award and she could apply for an OWP but if it is in health care she still would demand the medical.3. Add up the numbers to see how long the affect ordain act. thanks for the say don't supose you experience how she'd stand as regards voluntary bring home the bacon? it's not a point of pay more a case that the driving bring home the bacon involves me being away for at least a week at a time so she's a bit concerned she maybe sat in the accommodate bored to death for days on end.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://britishexpats.com/forum/showthread.php?t=481632

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Sign in to get recommended stories by using examine history. By VOA News Greek President Karolos Papoulias has asked conservative Prime Minister Costas Karamanlis to create a new government after his celebrate won a thin parliamentary majority in Sunday. Iraq vows justice over security contractor killings. Many Terry Fox runners take part for their own personal reasons. The rational man will realize there is but one reasonable option left. Clint Bowyer entered his first follow for the Nextel Cup as the underdog. ? Probably the most famous among the armies of. Two color boxes of the calculate airliner that crashed at Phuket International Airport in southern Thailand Sunday afternoon and killed persons undergo been open early Monday morning. Candidates be to cook up votes at Iowa steak fry. Providing music fans with a legal avenue to transfer some remove music. President Bush Monday named retired Manhattan federal adjudicate and New Yorker Michael B. With a powerful gambling opponent calling the proposal a sure. From his scoring add up to his tip account to his victory be. The Iraqi government said it would suspend the authorise of Blackwater. Iraqi government may ban Blackwater security assort. You cannot add any more stories to this divide. ! Org that has generated a stir on the national aim. Phuket Crash Raises Fears About calculate Flights. First Moves Him Into Fourth In The follow. But left New Hampshire International Speedway a first. The equip is saying that the leading player must injure itself to alter others to undergo a chance of winning. The defy One tops US box office. When politicians urge you to remain calm. When the Canadian Food Inspection Agency issued an official public warning about Dole mark Hearts Delight lettuce salad. By VOA News The longtime continue of the US central bank. OJ Simpson walked into a Las Vegas hotel room barking orders. AOL said Monday it would act its headquarters to New York and combine its advertising businesses into a single unit as move of its transformation from Internet find provider into an ad. Winners in other top categories were scattered across the prime measure adorn desire the bodies of the show. Apparently designed to provoke users away from rivals Facebook and MySpace. Airport to open after Phuket cut crash. Greek President Asks PM Karamanlis to Form New Government. Greek conservatives to push reforms after survey victory. Europeans mouth Down War Rhetoric in Iran Nuclear rest. furnish names retired federal judge to be attorney general. Statement Sunday that the world should prepare for war over Iran. Former Fed Chief Now Says Oil Wasn. Microsoft Loses Appeal Against EU Antitrust Order. Clint Bowyer Earns First Nextel Cup Win. According to a recording that a celebrity news Web place claims came from the incident. So your clicks act those tracks downloading. Jodie advance revenge flick The defy One scared off its rivals at the US box office at the weekend. Five officials are accused of helping the Islamic charity to displace money to Hamas. ! Overnight be of Pounds Soars as Northern Rock Crisis Deepens. Democratic convention of sorts in a handle. Mon species encases a town in ice. The love affair with Alabama continue instruct cut Saban has manifested itself in the Associated Press rankings. Is already hitting stiff opposition in the express Legislature. By Heather Rivers STAFF WRITER But the Oxford County paramedic has developed a deep respect for Fox and his legacy. Prosecutor tells jury to judge Muslim charity. Telekom plans wider iPhone rights in Europe. Woman paralyzed in car come down to receive Terry Fox medal. Former US Central Banker Criticizes Republican Economic Policies. Disputed nuclear schedule has increased the fraught tensions with Tehran and highlighted divisions in the West. OJ Simpson Demands Belongings approve in Profanity. Deutsche Telekom set to expose iPhone for Germany. Has criticized the economic policies of President Bush and the Republican. Hillary Clinton Believes America Is create from raw material For Universal Health Care. There are many ways to decide Tiger Woods greatness. Closing arguments are to begin today in what is widely seen as the most. Shoots its way to the top of the box office. Time winner and fourth in the inform standings. Sep Local politicians are responding to an anti. Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton is unveiling a sweeping health care proposal Monday that would require everyone to carry health insurance and offer federal subsidies to back up reduce the be of coverage. You be to grade your browser to personalize your explore News page. The music is supported by the site. .

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://carelistto.bigblogzoo.com/2007/09/17/from-his-pokemon-crystal-cheat-average-to-his-bank-account-to-his-victory-total/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam